Obama’s Dilemma: U.S. Foreign Policy and Electoral Realities
John Mauldin
September 22, 2011
Este artículo no está disponible en español. Para su comodidad, aquí está la versión en idioma Inglés.
Folks, this piece from STRATFOR has compelled me
to focus on the US for one more day before I head off to Europe. You've seen
the articles and other insights I send on occasion from George Friedman, my
friend and prophetic author of The Next 100 Years and The Next Decade,
both bestsellers. Well, this article takes the cake. George is the founder of a
geopolitical intelligence company called STRATFOR, whose focus is international
affairs. But on the rare occasion when domestic politics and international affairs
intersect, it's always a treat to get George's insight.
I don't even want to give away any spoilers here.
It's better to let you follow first-hand, as George builds his argument and
arrives at a profound final conclusion. Let me just say: In Endgame, as
you know, I predict that we will deal with the deficit in a controlled manner,
or face disastrous consequences. Here, we learn how the realities of the next
14 months before the presidential election present some potential global
consequences of their own.
If these occasional samples (which I get special
permission from George to send) aren't enough for you, my intelligent readers,
I recommend you get full access as a STRATFOR subscriber. OTB readers get a
<<steep
discount on subscriptions and a free copy of George's latest book>>,
which I mentioned above. I suggest you investigate. I read them every day
myself.
John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box
JohnMauldin@2000wave.com
Obama's Dilemma: U.S. Foreign Policy
and Electoral Realities
September
20, 2011

By George Friedman
STRATFOR
does not normally involve itself in domestic American politics. Our focus is on
international affairs, and American politics, like politics everywhere, is a
passionate business. The vilification from all sides that follows any mention
we make of American politics is both inevitable and unpleasant. Nevertheless,
it's our job to chronicle the unfolding of the international...
Comments
Bernardus Pottker
Sep. 24, 2011, 4:16 a.m.
If I understand you well, you believe that Obama, for domestic election purposes, should veto the Palestine membership in the United Nations now in order to get the Democrats vote (and the jewish support) for his upcoming election. Once he is elected, it seems that you think the international considerations will again take over and Obama will drop Israel and ask for a new vote in 2013 to get Palestine admitted.. Do you really think Obama is that smart and that devious? If so, hHe deserves to be President of the US—-he would be even better than Nixon/Kissinger (remember China).
Bernardus H. Pottker
Scottsdale, AZ.
Eddie Reynolds
Sep. 23, 2011, 4:59 p.m.
Selective memory is exactly what a lot of people have. As long as Fox news continues to mislead a number of people then we will be at great risk in this country. For forty years, Republican Presidents have acted like Democrats and Democratic Presidents have acted like Republicans. Obama and Bush as the most recent examples. Most just do not “get it” that the extremes of both parties do not work in the real world. Once someone is President they “get it”, whether they did before the election or not. If Obama gets elected will be because the majority realize the extremist “Tea Party” will wreck our economy. That’s what happen with the “Great Depression” and we got almost 40 years of all Democrats.
Charlie Lambert
Sep. 23, 2011, 1:03 p.m.
It reads like a standard summary of recent history. I would have been more interested in Stratfor’s projections, but Friedman says he doesn’t like to offer them because they generate hate mail. Oh well.