Recent Articles
Popular Tags
Past Archives
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (6)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (6)
- November 2011 (4)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (5)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (5)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (5)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (3)
- June 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (4)
- September 2007 (4)
- August 2007 (4)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (4)
- May 2007 (4)
- April 2007 (3)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (4)
- December 2006 (5)
- November 2006 (4)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (4)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (5)
- May 2006 (4)
- April 2006 (4)
- March 2006 (5)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (5)
- November 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (4)
- September 2005 (5)
- August 2005 (4)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (4)
- April 2005 (5)
- March 2005 (3)
- February 2005 (4)
- January 2005 (4)
- December 2004 (4)
- November 2004 (3)
- October 2004 (5)
- September 2004 (4)
- August 2004 (4)
- July 2004 (5)
- June 2004 (4)
- May 2004 (4)
- April 2004 (5)
- March 2004 (4)
- February 2004 (4)
- January 2004 (5)
- December 2003 (3)
- November 2003 (4)
- October 2003 (5)
- September 2003 (4)
- August 2003 (5)
- July 2003 (4)
- June 2003 (4)
- May 2003 (4)
- April 2003 (4)
- March 2003 (4)
- February 2003 (4)
- January 2003 (5)
- December 2002 (4)
- November 2002 (5)
- October 2002 (4)
- September 2002 (4)
- August 2002 (5)
- July 2002 (4)
- June 2002 (4)
- May 2002 (5)
- April 2002 (4)
- March 2002 (5)
- February 2002 (4)
- January 2002 (4)
- December 2001 (1)
- November 2001 (5)
- October 2001 (4)
- September 2001 (4)
- August 2001 (5)
- July 2001 (2)
- June 2001 (4)
- May 2001 (4)
- April 2001 (4)
- March 2001 (3)
- February 2001 (4)
- January 2001 (4)


Comments
jar jarwik
Jan. 15, 6:07 a.m.
The problem with the currently proposed solution is that Mrs Merkel is a German and thinks like a German - draft a set of Regulations and everyone will obey them - the peripheral countries have a different approach - the Rules are there to be circumnavigated - only fools obey the rules - that is why
we are not even approaching a solution to the €zone problem just yet
Luciano Zanfrini
Jan. 15, 3:15 a.m.
@Peter Connor “Socialist Europe has a poor work ethic outside of Germany” Do you really mean it? Have you read the International Labour Org. statistics that show that, for an example, we Italians work something like 10% more hours than the Germans? Do you know that, in a 50 years timeframe, we have one of the most balanced pensions system IN THE WHOLE WORLD? And what about the public, pensions, and trade deficits of UK and USA? I’m sick and tired of this racist and ignorant way of thinking of you anglosaxons. Let’s talk about REAL numbers, not about some isolationist rant.
Robert Watson 34060
Jan. 15, 12:32 a.m.
Dear John,
I agree with your analysis as far as it goes but I am unclear just how competitive devaluation of the US$, the £ sterling… makes them less vulnerable, less of a threat… (in extremis devaluation…) In my reading the 1930s crisis was only really “solved” (the NYT Nobel-Prize-winner notwithstanding) by WWII and the consequential forced cut in living standards; Schacht’s (?) public works expenditure, a directed economy and German rearmament also contributed initially. Are you aware that you could really be advocating (indirectly?) a solution of this kind and if so how would the political consequences be different in today’s Europe (or in the US for that matter) from that in the 1930s?
“Prior to the euro, the imbalances would be handled by currency exchange rates. The value of the drachma would go down relative to the value of the deutschmark. Things would balance over time. Now, all of the eurozone countries are effectively on a gold standard, with the euro standing in for gold this time. Britain, the US, and Japan print their own currencies. Their currencies can rise or fall over long periods of time, based on national accounts and the desires of foreigners to buy goods or invest in their countries.”
My second point is that a very large part of the world’s debt is theoretical, bumped up by “purely speculative options, CDS…” and the like and has little to do with the “physical” economy. Why do you appear to exclude a massive haircut, or even a simple cauterisation (repudiation? call it consolidation if you like!) of such debt. The US appears to be in an infinitely worse position as concerns its debt and the % of its economy that is purely speculative (and off-shore?). US competitive money printing may well have reached the point of diminishing returns, in particular as concerns the Fed’s ability to create employment…? Even the pump-prlming impact of US military expenditure appears to have run out of steam? The “capture” of US legislators by a variety of “speculators” (banks, hedge funds, off-shore SIVs of all kinds…) appears to make the US response to its “real” economy less flexible rather than more? What price some sort of directed economy? If so, who will be in charge?
ROBERT DECELL
Jan. 14, 11:20 p.m.
m
Myron Martin
Jan. 14, 10:09 p.m.
Great work in laying out the consequences of Keynesian solutions to debt. I have to wonder whether all the highly educated functionaries who are manipulating the fractional reserve banking system to try and keep this Ponzi scheme alive failed mathematics in school.
The basic foundational truth is that long term interest is mathematically impossible for the simple reason that our debt based fiat currency is brought into existence as DEBT requiring the payment of interest, yet only the principal is ever created. Since it requires a specific amount of currency in circulation for an economy to function the bleeding off of interest means the only way it can be paid as the pyramid of debt accumulates is if ever larger and numerous loans are contracted to keep the system liquid.
As with any pyramid eventually you reach the limits of willing players (borrowers as well as viable collateral) and then deflation sets in as the debt can no longer be serviced as John as so ably pointed out. The problem is structural, and reform of the system is desperately needed, yet it is not likely to happen until the system simply breaks down as it is much too profitable for the elite bankers running this scam with the connivance of the political class that also benefits by getting elected on promises they can’t keep without in-debting the citizens they are supposed to serve and selling generations into debt slavery.
There is no way out of this debt trap without a lot of pain and chances are the elite will start another a war as a distraction (Iran) with an appeal to patriotism and justification for more printing of fiat currency.
scott grider
Jan. 14, 4:39 p.m.
they print n try to extend the piigs[how do u get ANY austerty then?] .....or they let ‘em leave [thru paralysis probly] and print to bail the banks on the ‘hook’ out.
DOW tanks, ben doesn’t wait in an election year[i can hear the midnite phone calls now].......gets in the helicopter w/tee-shirt shooters full of 100$ bills.
thats how they get out of this….as usual…...
the script has already been written:
http://www.safehaven.com/article/23974/deadly-dow-36000-and-the-secret-history-of-a-70-market-loss